Validation
Establishing ShellSIM's credibility
The scientific basis whereby an early version of ShellSIM replicated dynamic adjustments in
feeding, metabolism and growth within individual larvae or seed during different temporal and
spatial scenarios of culture to harvestable size was originally reported by Hawkins et al. (2002).
Since then, a common set of functional physiological interdependencies have been confirmed and
refined using standardized procedures over a broad range of species and sites (illustrated below)
(Hawkins et al., 2012, 2013a, 2013c).
This common set of relations may now be calibrated within ShellSIM for different species, when growth
(illustrated below) and its component physiological processes are successfully simulated across full
natural ranges of temporal and spatial variability in natural environments that range from open water
to turbid estuaries.
The robustness of ShellSIM’s common structure is confirmed by successful calibration and validation in
14 species to date, simulating to <25% error even when applying a single standard set of parameters to
predict individual growth in the same species across contrasting environments and culture practices, as
has been shown in M. edulis and C. gigas and C. virginica to date (summarized in Table below).

To further establish ShellSIM’s credibility, we have undertaken analyses of goodness of fit based upon
comparisons between simulated and observed growth of individual shellfish using linear regression as described
by Portilla and Tett (ECASA Internal Paper, 2007). Trans-site analysis of all measured and predicted data, using
a single standard set of ShellSIM parameters, for C. gigas during normal culture in
the Sanggou Bay (China), Oosterscheldt (Netherlands), Strangford Lough (Northern Ireland), Carlingford Lough
(Northern Ireland), Clew Bay (Republic of Ireland) and Loch Creran (Scotland) indicated that the slope and intercept
of fitted regression were both different from zero (p < 0.05), and that the slope is
significantly different from 1 (p < 0.05) (illustrated below).

Similarly, trans-site analysis of all measured and predicted data, using a single standard set of
ShellSIM parameters, for M. edulis during normal culture in the
Oosterscheldt (Netherlands), Strangford Lough (Northern Ireland), Carlingford Lough (Northern Ireland),
Lough Foyle (Northern Ireland), Belfast Lough (Northern Ireland) and Clew Bay (Republic of Ireland)
indicated that the slope and intercept of fitted regression were both different from zero (p < 0.05),
and that the slope is significantly different from 1 (p < 0.05). On which basis, according to Oreskes
et al. (1994), ShellSIM’s generic performance when applying a single standard set of parameters to
predict growth across a broad range of culture environments and practices throughout Europe and Asia is
classified as “good” to “excellent” in both C. gigas and M. edulis (Hawkins et al., 2013a).
Compared with the many models that have been optimised in a single location or system, this a significant
step forward, not only in the face of contrasting environments, but also of different genetic background
(i.e. shellfish stocks) and culture methods that vary between locations.
Ability to up-scale from the individual to the population, taking density-dependent effects into account,
has been validated on numerous occasions through effective simulations of farm- and/or system-scale production
using principles that are now afforded within ShellSIM; those analyses helping to optimise culture practise
and simulate interrelations between shellfish and key ecosystem properties and/or processes when cultured
under different scenarios at sites in America, Europe and Asia (Bacher et al., 2003; Duarte et al., 2003;
Nunes et al., 2003, 2011; Ferreira et al., 2005, 2006, 2007a, 2007b, 2008a, 2008b, 2009; Hawkins et al., 2007;
Gubbins et al., 2008; Sequiera et al., 2008; Nobre et al., 2010; Newell et al., 2012a, 2012b, 2013a, 2013b, 2013c, 2013d).
As examples of such up-scaling, when ShellSIM has been integrated within collaborative tools for practical
use by aquaculture farmers, environmental managers and regulators, Project booklets are available by clicking
on the thumbnails below.

Sustainable Mariculture in Northern Irish Lough Ecosystems (SMILE)
|

Sustainable Options for People, Catchment and Aquatic Resources (SPEAR)
|